Quantcast
Channel: meshing - Another Fine Mesh
Viewing all 175 articles
Browse latest View live

This Month in CFD

$
0
0

Altair: Altair Technologies and FluiDyna are collaborating on GPU-accelerated CFD. On a related note, Altair will be the exclusive worldwide reseller of the nanoFluidX technology.

ANSYS: ANSYS was recognized at The Engineering Simulation Show for its quality, innovation, and financial performance as company of the year. Also, the company’s GAAP revenue for Q1 was $218 million, up 1%.

arterial disease: CFD aids in the diagnosis and risk assessment of coronary artery disease.

AutoCAD: The Engineers Guide to Drinks was created 1972 on a lark to test plotters. It found new life recently (download the DWG file here) and is now being converted to 3D.

The Engineers Guide to Drinks. Drawn in AutoCAD. Image from Between the Lines blog. See links above.

The Engineers Guide to Drinks. Drawn in AutoCAD. Image from Between the Lines blog. See links above.

Beta CAE: ANSA v15.2.4 was released.

CAD: The worldwide CAD market in 2014 was $8 billion and is expected to grow with a CAGR of 4% through 2017.

CAE Associates: Structural finite element modeling came to rescue of Adam, a marble statue by Tullio Lombardo (1460-1532), that fell and broke into 28 large pieces and an uncountable number of fragments in 2002. FEA helped assure museum curators that the repairs (pins and glue) would work while also being reversible if needed.

FEA contributed to the repair of Tullio Lombardo's Adam. Image from CAE Associates. See link above.

FEA contributed to the repair of Tullio Lombardo’s Adam. Image from CAE Associates. See link above.

Caelus: Version 5.04 of Caelus is available for download.

CD-adapco: In case you missed the event, pretend you were there with CD-adapco’s STAR Global Conference 2015 photo gallery. Or you could read Monica Schnitger’s summary of the event. In which you’ll learn what STAR stands for.

COMSOL: Comsol Multiphysics 5.1 was released.

cycling: CFD is used to design bicycling helmets.

Dalton: Project Dalton, 1D flow analysis, from Autodesk Labs remains free for a bit longer.

drilling: Los Alamos performed CFD simulations of offshore drilling rigs.

CFD simulation performed by Los Alamos to study vortex induced motion on offshore drilling rigs. Image from Int'l Science Grid This Week. See link above.

CFD simulation performed by Los Alamos to study vortex induced motion on offshore drilling rigs. Image from Int’l Science Grid This Week. See link above.

Edwin, Colin: Musician Colin Edwin (Porcupine Tree, Metallic Taste of Blood, O.R.k.) released a new digital-only EP titled Mesh. [I am a big fan of Colin’s music and am using his album’s title as an excuse to post here. It’s my blog after all.]

Mesh by Colin Edwin. Image from Colin Edwin's blog. See link above.

Mesh by Colin Edwin. Image from Colin Edwin’s blog. See link above.

EnSight: CEI asks whether 32-bit support is still wanted for EnSight beginning in 2016. Also, there’s now a data converter from EMSolution to EnSight.

ESI: The ESI Group acquired the assets of Ciespace, the cloud-based CFD provider. Ciespace will [already has?] begun integrating ESI’s software into Ciespace’s open, web-services platform. Monica Schnitger shared her thoughts on this deal.

exhaust: CFD is being used to design intake and exhaust systems for surface ships.

Flow Science: FLOW-3D News was published for Spring 2015. Also, speakers were announced for their European Users Conference.

Ford: A CFD Engineer is sought by Ford Motor Co. in Dearborn, MI.

GrabCAD: Read about multi-disciplinary 3D design.

Hex: A frontal approach to hex-dominant mesh generation by Baudouin et al.

Cutaway view of a hex-dominant mesh for a filter mount using the method by Baudouin et al. Image from Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Services. See link above.

Cutaway view of a hex-dominant mesh for a filter mount using the method by Baudouin et al. Image from Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Services. See link above.

Hi-Tech: Three ways to get value from your CFD when you use it as a precursor to prototype tests. #1 Measure things you can’t measure with a test.

Indy 500: Honda’s aero kit for their Indy car chassis was developed using CFD.

Leap CFD: A hybrid RANS-LES approach was used to model flow over terrain and an urban environment as part of a wind engineering study related to energy harvesting. [Be certain to watch the video.]

ANSYS CFD simulation of flow over an urban environment. Image from Leap CFD. See link above.

ANSYS CFD simulation of flow over an urban environment. Image from Leap CFD. See link above.

LearnCAx: CCTech launched free CFD education via their massive open online course LearnCAx.

LimitState: The latest version of LimitState:FIX is available for repairing 3D faceted geometry for 3D printing.

mantle: Princeton researchers used adjoint methods to study seismic wave propagation through the earth to map its non-uniformity.

Seismic wave speeds below the Pacific ocean. Red is slower, blue is faster. Image from International Science Grid This Week. See link above.

Seismic wave speeds below the Pacific ocean. Red is slower, blue is faster. Image from International Science Grid This Week. See link above.

Mentor Graphics: Read about calibration of electronics thermal simulation models.

MeshUp: The Kickstarter campaign for this tool for a “3D modeling mashup tool for meshes” is now in beta.

MeshUp is a Kickstarter-funded mashup tool for meshes. Image from Kickstarter. See link above.

MeshUp is a Kickstarter-funded mashup tool for meshes. Image from Kickstarter. See link above. [Do not question why you’d want to mashup the Utah teapot and the Stanford bunny.]

Nagoya: CD-adapco opened an office in Nagoya, Japan.

NASA: If you can demonstrate a 1000x speed-up of a CFD solution over FUN3D NASA may award you $500,000. [An “X-Prize” for CFD? Hell yes. [Note: X-Prize is probably someone’s trademark so forgive the usage.]] There’s a link at the site to NASA’s request for information as they try to decide whether to pull the trigger on this idea.

news: TenLinks and ENGINEERING.com have merged.

NUMECA: NUMECA‘s CFD software is being used to help Oracle Team USA prepare for the Americas Cup.

Octree: Advances in parallelization of large scale oct-tree mesh generation by O’Connell and Karman.

Onshape: Onshape beta is reviewed by DEVELOP3D.

PADT: CoresOnDemand.com, an HPC resource for ANSYS users, was launched by PAD-T. [I can’t help getting hungry for Thai food every time I see PADT come up in the news.]

PyFR: Version 0.8.0 of PyFR was released.

ReFRESCO-Operation: MARIN’s ReFRESCO-Operation is a partnership with clients for marine applications of CFD using the ReFRESCO CFD code and MARIN’s compute cluster.

SimuTech Group: ANSYS designated SimuTech Group as an Elite Channel Partner. SimuTech is said to be the largest full-service provider of ANSYS’s CAE software in North America.

SolidWorks: Here’s a checklist for running SolidWorks Flow Simulation.

SpaceX: Watch this video of a GPU-based simulation of SpaceX’s rocket engine.

Symscape: CFD for unconventional designs.

Tech Soft 3D: Tech Soft 3D announced the new HOOPS Cloud Platform and HOOPS Desktop Platform.

Tecplot: In the 4th installment of their “trillion cell challenge,” Tecplot describes their approach to the input/output bottleneck when visualizing massive computational simulations. See also their 300 billion cell results.

Performance improvement of the latest version of Tecplot versus previous versions for handling massive datasets. Image from Tecplot. See link above.

Performance improvement of the latest version of Tecplot versus previous versions for handling massive datasets. Image from Tecplot. See link above.

TotalCAE: Billing themselves as the “IT department for CFD engineers,” TotalCAE offers a number of products including a private cloud, turnkey HPC cluster with support for all popular CFD solvers.

V&V: Tony Abbey explains verification and validation for FEA in Desktop Engineering.

wind turbine: CFD simulation of a floating offshore wind turbine.

Wirth Research: F-1 designer Nick Wirth’s team used CFD to design an aerodynamic package for Scania R-series trucks that reduces drag by 10% relative to other add-on kits.

6SigmaET: Future Facilities’ CFD solver 6SigmaET was awarded Product of the Year at the Engineering Simulation Awards Show.

Stellar – Meshed – Caves

Artist Julien Salaud‘s 3D, immersive, polygonal, sculptures are made from thread that’s illuminated by UV light. The result is like walking through the craziest mesh you’ve ever generated. See more at This is Colossal.

Julien Salaud, Stellar Caves. Image from Colossal.

Julien Salaud, Stellar Caves. Image from Colossal.



This Week in CFD

$
0
0

Software

  • Siemens PLM Software released Solid Edge ST8.
  • Materialise released 3-maticSTL v10.0.
  • Beta CAE released ANSA v15.3.0.
  • CD-adapco released DARS v2.1 0D and 1D management of chemical reactions. [What I found most curious about this announcement is that my web browser’s URL bar shows a copyright registration symbol in the web page’s URL. I had no idea you could do that.]
The winner of 2015's Science as Art contest. Try to figure out what this image shows before clicking through to the article. Image from Int'l Science Grid This Week.

The winner of 2015’s Science as Art contest. Try to figure out what this image shows before clicking through to the article. Image from Int’l Science Grid This Week. [Yes, this should probably be placed below in the section on Awards.]

Miscellaneous

  • “Why Multi-Core CPUs are Useless for CAD” [Because I often draw analogies between CAD and meshing (because the latter is more like the former than it is a CFD solver, for example) and because I think multi-core CPUs are useful for meshing, I disagree a little with this statement. OK, meshing algorithms can take a long time to run and can benefit from multi-core programming. But there are a lot of other things happening that can benefit from multi-core. Don’t you think?]
  • A senior CFD specialist in building services is being sought in Hong Kong.
  • The call for papers is now open for the COMSOL Conference 2015 (Boston, 7-9 Oct) with an early due date of 19 June and final due date of 31 July.

Fun With Bubbles

Screen capture from the video on Discrete Circulation-Preserving Vortex Sheets for Soap Films and Foams. See link below.

Screen capture from the video on Discrete Circulation-Preserving Vortex Sheets for Soap Films and Foams. See link below.

Submitted by blog reader and fluids researcher Dr. Christopher Batty comes this video on “using non-manifold triangle meshes to animate soap bubbles, films, and foams, using a method based on the equations of vortex sheets.” The work is the subject of an upcoming SIGGRAPH paper. Be certain to watch the video all the way to the end (it’s only 5 minutes) to see the bubbles popping.

Applications

The Living Heart Project created this model using SIMULIA. Image from Desktop Engineering. Click image for article.

The Living Heart Project created this model using SIMULIA. Image from Desktop Engineering. Click image for article.

  • Desktop Engineering wrote about the use of simulation for medical applications.
  • Exa tells how autonomous vehicles are effected by aerodynamics. [Note: This link was added after this post was initially published.]

Awards

  • Here’s some award-winning CFD work on cooling data centers by a PhD student at SUNY Binghampton.
  • Another CFD researcher, this one from the Shipbuilding Research Center of Japan, won the DNV GL COMPIT Award for his work in advancing the use of HPC for shipbuilding.
  • MSC’s Apex is a finalist for a Stevie Award.
  • And to round out the awarding of awards, ANSYS received a Confirmit ACE award for their customer service.

Discretization: On the Computer and IRL

Discretization is obviously a part of CFD and simulations in general. The image below is a screen capture from a video called Pixel WORLD that shows various particle-based simulations with a particle size coarse enough to give a voxel effect.

Screen capture from the video Pixel WORLD, a montage of particle simulations on a coarse, voxel scale. Click image for video.

Screen capture from the video Pixel WORLD, a montage of particle simulations on a coarse, voxel scale. Click image for video.

But discretization is appealing in real life too as illustrated in the gorgeous photo below from Lernert & Sander called Cubes in which unprocessed food has been diced into perfect 2.5 cm sided cubes.

Cubes: discretized food by Lernert & Sander. Image from Lernert & Sander. Click image for source.

Cubes: discretized food by Lernert & Sander. Image from Lernert & Sander. Click image for source.


This Week in CFD

$
0
0

Events

Software

Screen capture from a video illustration of STAR-CCM+'s new color maps. Image from CD-adapco. See link above.

Screen capture from a video illustration of STAR-CCM+’s new color maps. Image from CD-adapco. See link below.

  • STAR-CCM+ includes new, improved, and customizable color maps for visualizing your CFD results. [This is good stuff and a nice coincidence considering my recent attendance at Edward Tufte’s course, one of those guys who hates the rainbow color map. If only they hadn’t slapped that hideous “New” badge on the image.]
  • CD-adapco announced an initiative in the area of particle flow physics.
  • 3DX is an online community for browsing, downloading, and exchanging 3D models.

Miscellaneous

This image of a ship hull's mesh is from MarineLink.com and was generated using CD-adapco's tools. See link below.

This image of a ship hull’s mesh is from MarineLink.com and was generated using CD-adapco’s tools. See link below.

  • From MarineLink.com comes a look at numerical towing tanks.
  • Monica Schnitger breaks down Exa‘s Q1 performance and shows us that their license revenue was $12 million (+5%) and their project revenue was $2.5 million (+20%). [Please be reminded that following Exa is important as they’re the only publicly traded pure CFD company. That I’m aware of at least.]
  • Rescale launched ScaleX Enterprise, a version of their cloud HPC product that can be deployed within a company (i.e. a turnkey private cloud).

Pointwise News

  • Pointwise Version 17.3 R2 was released. It includes new features for generating overset structured hex grids using the hyperbolic PDE-based extrusion method (new boundary conditions and wider topology support).
  • Pointwise V17.3 R2 is also compatible with the Leap Motion Controller for touch-free image manipulation (pan, zoom, rotate). And you can earn one of those devices for free: see the details here.
  • We have a webcast coming up on 10 June that will introduce you into making Pointwise compatible with your CFD solver: Intro to Plugin Development.
  • If you’ll be attending AIAA Aviation in Dallas in June there will be many ways for us to learn, explore, and mingle.
    • A Let’s Talk Meshing Workshop on Sunday that’ll cover the latest features and what’s coming in the future.
    • A reception Sunday night.
    • Two technical presentations.
    • Booth #307 in the exhibit hall.
    • See our Aviation page for all the details.

[Yes, I toot my own horn every once in a while.]

Pixelated Fur

I won’t even attempt to spin the click-bait title Pixelated Fur into something mesh-related. But it does follow along with the trend I’ve been observing about digital ideas in analog art.

Daniel Rozin has created for your experiential pleasure a mirror of sorts; one that reflects your image in discrete furry black and white pixels. 928 of them to be exact, coupled with a Microsoft Kinect. Just walk up and see yourself reflected in soft, cuddly “furxels.” [Copyright © John Chawner, 2015, All rights reserved.]

Daniel Rozin, PomPom Mirror, 2015. Image from Visual News. See link above.

Daniel Rozin, PomPom Mirror, 2015. Image from Visual News. See link above.

Bonus: Remember Artsy’s auction of algorithmic and code-related artwork? All lots sold. I’m having trouble finding a comprehensive list of final sale prices but is appears a handwritten 4-line “Hello World” program by Brian Kernighan went for $4,000.


Impressions of the 10th OpenFOAM Workshop

$
0
0

As a new OpenFOAM user I had the opportunity to attend the 10th OpenFOAM Workshop held at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Pointwise participated in the workshop in a variety of ways: we sponsored it, we worked the booth, and we presented our own work. In short, it was a great week!

The Workshop Venue and Program

The nice weather (coming from Texas that is very important!) and the university’s beautiful campus characterized by open spaces and a unique combination of classical and modern architecture made this the perfect location for the workshop. On top of the nice setting, a relaxed atmosphere and the collaborative spirit among all the participants greatly facilitated (and I would dare say encouraged) the exchange of ideas, experiences, and current struggles with some of the most renowned names in the OpenFOAM community.

In my opinion, the workshop was well structured and nicely organized (kudos to Dr. Kevin Maki and the organizing committee!). It featured a nice balance between keynotes, papers, and training sessions that pretty much guaranteed that everyone in attendance would come out of the workshop with a good understanding of the current state-of-the-art in OpenFOAM and the challenges being faced by this community moving forward.

Technical Presentations and Training

On the first day of the workshop I attended the Pre-Processing/ Post-Processing/ Meshing session. The first presentation was entitled Assessment of Automatic Mesh Generation Algorithm Using snappyHexMesh 2.3. The presenter did a very good job discussing the performance of the different Cartesian dominated mesh generation algorithms in snappyHexMesh using different geometries focused on internal turbulent flow applied to hydraulic machinery. This presentation was particularly interesting to me because it was my first encounter with snappyHexMesh.

Another truly interesting presentation in the same session was the one entitled Evolving HELYX-OS, the Open-Source Graphical User Interface for OpenFOAM. As you can imagine, the idea of a graphical interface for OpenFOAM sounds very appealing to a new OpenFOAM user like myself! Here the presenter showed the main features available in the new HELYX-OS v2 software. He focused on the new interface for the creation of block meshes and the visualization of feature lines to allow for a better detection of edges during the mesh generation process. Overall, the presentation was a nice overview of HELYX-OS.

Just in case the seemingly unending stream of very good and useful presentations was not enough, the workshop also offered twelve training sessions that spanned a variety of relevant topics to the OpenFOAM community. The best part of this was that the training sessions were conveniently divided into three different levels: basic, intermediate, and advanced. Each track ensured that attendees would learn something useful regardless of their level of expertise in a certain area of interest.

I had the opportunity to attend two training sessions: Introduction to Paraview (beginner level) and A Concise Introduction to snappyHexmesh Theory and Application (intermediate level). I enjoyed both of them! They gave me a greater insight into the inner workings of these two pieces of software that are used by several of our customers. As a member of the Support Team, having knowledge of the different tools being used by our customers helps me to better understand their grid generation needs and this, in turn, allows me to provide them with a high level of technical support.

Meshing Considerations for Automotive Design Optimization

On Wednesday afternoon Travis Carrigan, a Senior Engineer in our Sales & Marketing Team, joined Optimal Solutions’ Mark Landon to discuss our joint automotive design optimization work. Our paper titled Meshing Considerations for Automotive Design Optimization described a collection of strategies and best practices for cleaning and meshing complex analytic CAD models encountered in the automotive industry. The high quality grids generated by our viscous unstructured meshing tool, T-Rex, are a prerequisite for shape deformation as they eliminate the need for remeshing from the typical design optimization loop.

High quality meshing coupled with robust shape deformation techniques enable large space design exploration for optimization without the need for remeshing.

High quality meshing coupled with robust shape deformation techniques enable large space design exploration for optimization without the need for remeshing.

Hybrid volume mesh for the DrivAer geometry colored by element volume.

Hybrid volume mesh for the DrivAer geometry colored by element volume.

A close up of the side mirror shows in detail the anisotropic layers of combined prisms generated by our T-Rex algorithm.

A close up of the side mirror shows in detail the anisotropic layers of combined prisms generated by our T-Rex algorithm.

The Henry Ford Museum

To wrap up the content-packed Wednesday, we had the chance to relax and enjoy a nice reception at the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Michigan. The museum houses a large collection of rare exhibits including John F. Kennedy’s presidential limousine, Abraham Lincoln’s chair from Ford’s Theater, and the Rosa Parks bus among many others. If you have never been there (or if you have been there and would like to check out the new attractions), it is highly recommended!

Two of the main attractions that we got to enjoy at the Henry Ford Museum: the Rosa Parks bus and Lincoln’s chair from Ford’s Theater.

Two of the main attractions that we got to enjoy at the Henry Ford Museum: the Rosa Parks bus and Lincoln’s chair from Ford’s Theater.

Birds of a Feather Sessions

On the last day of the workshop several Birds of a Feather sessions were held where Grid Generation happened to be the most voted for topic. The meshing discussion group had about 35 people and we had the chance to discuss several relevant topics:

  • Grid Generation Software: To our surprise there were 21 different grid generation packages currently being used by the people in our group. Furthermore, everybody was using at least two different tools to generate the grids that they need.
  • Grid Quality: Grid quality and effect on solution accuracy was a reoccurring theme in our discussion. Metrics such as element volume, orthogonality, skewness, and volume ratio were mentioned as contributors to poor solution accuracy. That being said, grid quality goes beyond geometry and is also driven by the specifics of the simulation being performed. While there was an idea of coming up with a single grid quality metric for OpenFOAM, we elected to ask the community to describe the metrics that affect their solutions for a variety of problem types.
  • Geometry: Most of the members of our discussion group pointed out that they primarily use discrete geometry in the STL format and that one of the biggest bottlenecks in their workflow is cleaning bad CAD data. We discussed the idea of using analytic geometry for quality and workflow improvements.
  • Automated vs. Automatic: We took a vote and it was clear that engineers need control over their grids and that several tools seem to be taking that control away from the user in favor of automatic meshing.
  • Solution Adaptive Meshing and Parallelization: All the members in our discussion group agreed that these two topics are very important to them. Particularly, they all want the ability to parallelize the grid generation process in order to generate bigger grids in a shorter period of time.

Conclusions

Overall it was a great workshop and I would recommend everyone interested in learning more about OpenFOAM to attend in the future. Next year the workshop will be held in Portugal. We are very thankful to the organizers for setting up the perfect venue that allowed us to meet with old friends and make new ones while enjoying very relevant presentations and training sessions. We certainly hope everyone enjoyed the workshop as much as we did.

If you’d like to learn more about the 10th OpenFOAM Workshop and view the presentations, please visit www.ofw10.org.


Pointwise at MeshTrends 10

$
0
0

Nick Wyman, Pointwise’s director of applied research, will be presenting the results of some recent work on sizing functions for tetrahedral meshes at next week’s Symposium on Trends in Unstructured Mesh Generation (aka MeshTrends).

Nick’s presentation, Element-Size Gradation in an Unstructured Tetrahedral Mesh Using Radial Basis Functions, was co-authored with his Pointwise colleagues Mike Jefferies, Steve Karman, and John Steinbrenner, and is scheduled for Monday 27 July at 11:20 a.m. in room Promenade B.

Example of a tet mesh with an imposed element sizing field.

Example of a tet mesh with an imposed element sizing field.

The presentation’s abstract:

Generation of a constrained tetrahedral mesh with a prescribed element size gradation requires knowledge of the desired element size at discrete locations in the domain. User control of element size gradation is provided through the constraining surface mesh, optional primitive (curve and surface) shape sources, influence parameters, and a background mesh size. These user controls, while convenient and natural, are in a form difficult to translate to an arbitrary point in the domain. Furthermore, if the input is inconsistent, which is common in the authors’ experience, discontinuities in the desired element size field can be created leading to poor mesh quality. We propose a method for general interpolation of a user prescribed element size field which also minimizes the effect of inconsistent input. A method for defining and interpolating a target 3D element size field utilizing radial basis functions (RBF) will be described. The process begins with the conversion of the constraining surface mesh and optional primitive shape sources into an equivalent element size field represented by radial basis functions. In our method, each RBF provides local target element size using a linear distance function. Selection of a linear distance function for element size allows for natural definition of the input influence parameter also known as the element growth rate. Furthermore, an individual RBF is only effective within a distance defined by the background mesh size and the influence parameter. Each constraining surface point contributes an RBF formed from the local surface element size, the influence parameter, and the background mesh size. Our application utilizes non-uniform rational basis spline (NURBS) curves and surfaces for primitive shape definition. Target element size and influence parameters are assigned at parametric locations within the NURBS definition. A discrete tessellation of the NURBS shape is then created with each point generating an RBF. Finally, the desired element size at a discrete position is calculated from a blend of the effective RBFs in the region. Results from a variety of weighting schemes will be presented along with efficiency gains introduced through the use of oct-tree sorting of the RBFs.

MeshTrends is a symposium held annually in conjunction with the U.S. National Congress on Computational Mechanics. This year’s event is being held in beautiful San Diego, California.

If you’ll be at MeshTrends, don’t hesitate to meet Nick and ask him questions about this research.


This Week in CFD

$
0
0

News

  • Readers of FYFD [the best blog with a name I can’t say to my mother] are invited to participate in a reader survey.
  • The National Science Foundation is sponsoring the Beauty of Computing campaign and asks that you post “computer generated images that bring science to life” using the #beautyofcomputing hashtag.
  • MAYA has several job openings in CFD and CAE.
DEVELOP3D reviewed ANSYS AIM 16.1 for multiphysics simulation. Image from DEVELOP3D. Click image for article.

DEVELOP3D reviewed ANSYS AIM 16.1 for multiphysics simulation. Image from DEVELOP3D. Click image for article.

Applications

ENGINEERING.com has a nice article on the CFD of racing bikes including the effect that a trailing automobile can have on a cyclist's finish. Image from ENGINEERING.com. Click image for article.

ENGINEERING.com has a nice article on the CFD of racing bikes including the effect that a trailing automobile can have on a cyclist’s finish. Image from ENGINEERING.com. Click image for article.

  • Jaguar Land Rover is using STAR-CCM+ as part of a coupled multi-physics simulation of vehicle wading (i.e. driving your car through water of various depths). [Ask me about the time I was driven through water deep enough to flow over the hood of a rental car.]
  • CFD contributed to the design of a next generation LNG carrier ship (8% more energy efficient, 5% more cargo) via the LNGreen Joint Industry Project.
The folks at CFD Support have been working on transient simulation of a sports car with rotating wheels in OpenFOAM. Click image for web page and video.

The folks at CFD Support have been working on transient simulation of a sports car with rotating wheels in OpenFOAM. Click image for web page and video.

Software

Events & Reading

An interesting slide from Airbus' presentation on HPC needs of simulation in which we see that "one night batch capability" for CFD based noise simulation is coming in early 2020. Image from ThePlatform.net. See link above.

An interesting slide from Airbus’ presentation on HPC needs of simulation in which we see that “one night batch capability” for CFD based noise simulation is coming in early 2020. Image from ThePlatform.net. See link above.

Music, Physics, Physics, Music

For the third time, the Montreux Jazz Festival featured a workshop on The Physics of Music and the Music of Physics. The former revolved around work done on sonic spatialization (i.e. multidimensionality of sound) while the latter centered on a piano improvisation by Al Blatter with accompaniment by sounds synthesized from collisions in the Large Hadron Collider.

Jazz pianist Al Blatter performing a live improv to sounds from the LHC. Image from Int'l Science Grid This Week. See links above.

Jazz pianist Al Blatter performing a live improv to sounds from the LHC. Image from Int’l Science Grid This Week. See links above.

(Originally seen on International Science Grid This Week.)

Bonus: For those of you addicted to meshes and geometry in art I share Jiyong Lee’s stunning glass sculptures from his Segmentation series. While the artist’s inspiration for these works is the biological process of cell division, I can’t help but see 3D domain decompositions. I checked into pricing for these works and the numbers are well into the 5 figure range. I’m not even a huge fan of sculpture in general but these works make me want to hold them.

Jiyong Lee, White Axial Cuboid Biaxial Segmentation, 2014. Image from the artist's website. See link above.

Jiyong Lee, White Axial Cuboid Biaxial Segmentation, 2014. Image from the artist’s website. See link above.


This Week in CFD

$
0
0

News

  • It seems that President Obama is also a fan of the CFD Vision 2030 Study as it is cited in the Whitehouse’s recent announcement of the executive order creating the National Strategic Computing Initiative, a research program intended to push U.S. HPC into the exaflops and exabytes realm.
  • A new CAE (i.e. FEA and CFD) market forecast predicts growth of 11.34% during the period 2014-2019. [Sadly, I’m way too jaded to take most of these forecasts seriously.]
  • GrabCAD does a good job of describing up and coming discrete geometry (aka 3D printing) file formats: AMF vs. 3DF.
Sample computation from Beta CAE's new Epilysis FEA solver. Image from ENGINEERING.com. See link below.

Sample computation from Beta CAE’s new Epilysis FEA solver. Image from ENGINEERING.com. See link below.

Software

  • MSC Apex Diamond Python [wow] was released and includes advances in mid-surface modeling.
  • Beta CAE System included a new FEA solver, Eπilysis [ωοω], in release 16 of their software suite.
  • OpenVSP 3.2.0, the open source parametric aircraft geometry tool, was released.
  • Feature detection (mesh to surfaces and features) is coming in the next release of Polygonica as we see from this article in DEVELOP3D.
  • Updated versions of MicroCFD are now available.
  • Kitware shares information about Computational Model Builder, their framework for end-to-end simulation support including preprocessing.
Part of a nuclear reactor mesh generated using components of Kitware's CMB. Image from Kitware. See link above.

Part of a nuclear reactor mesh generated using components of Kitware’s CMB. Image from Kitware. See link above.

Events

Meshing

Guitar body geometry displayed in Pointwise for the 23rd International Meshing Roundtable meshing contest.

Guitar body geometry displayed in Pointwise for the 23rd International Meshing Roundtable meshing contest.

What If Your Mesh Came to Life?

When it comes to abstract painting, not every horizontal line is a horizon and not every vertical line is a person. But it seems to me that every triangle, square, tet, or hex is a mesh. Because that’s the first thing I thought of when I saw 1024 architecture‘s video The Walking Cube.

Screen capture of 1024 architecture's video The Walking Cube. Click image for video.

Screen capture of 1024 architecture’s video The Walking Cube. Click image for video.

In fact, I find the video oddly nightmarish – a Frankensteinian hex mesh cell come to life, awkward yet menacing. Is this what happens to cells inside mesh generation software when they’re being generated and stretched and skewed and sized to our specifications? It looks tortuous. Maybe this hex has escaped the mesh to seek vengeance for how it has suffered.

Or maybe I just need a good night’s sleep.


This Week in CFD

$
0
0

Meshing

  • Siemens PLM Software is celebrating 30 Years of Femap with a brief video history. [I remember seeing some of those early ads in print magazines.] Congratulations to our meshing friends from the structures side of the CAE world.
  • In a discovery said to be similar to finding a new subatomic particle, mathematicians have identified a type of irregular pentagon (see image below) capable of tessellating a plane. [How long before we start meshing with these types of cells?]
You can add this newly identified irregular pentagon as one of the types of polygons able to tile a plane. Image from HuffPost Science. See link above.

You can add this newly identified irregular pentagon as one of the types of polygons able to tile a plane. Image from HuffPost Science. See link above.

Events

Business

  • The global market for CAE software (including CFD) is forecast to grow 11.34% over the period 2014-2019 according to one report. [I’m baffled by the desire/need to publish a growth percentage with two digits to the right of the decimal point.]
  • The U.S. Army seeks someone with a PhD to do CFD at their Biotechnology High Performance Computing Software Applications Institute in Maryland.

Software

  • CAESES 4.0 includes many new capabilities for axial blade design.
  • simFlow 2.1 was released with four new solvers, support for large meshes, and more.
  • In other FLOW-3D news, they’ve decreased the runtime of their solver by more than 50% in some cases.

Applications

CFD for the Batmobile courtesy of Autodesk Simulation. Click image for video.

CFD for the Batmobile courtesy of Autodesk Simulation. Click image for video.

  • There will likely be a need for CFD to evaluate the impact of closed cockpits on Formula 1 cars.
  • Intelligent Light shares their thoughts on the visualization aspects of the CFD Vision 2030 Study.
  • STAR-CCM+ was used to model blood flow for a new stent design.
Software Cradle shares a case study of the use of scSTREAM for architectural design. Image from Software Cradle. Click image for article.

Software Cradle shares a case study of the use of scSTREAM for architectural design. Image from Software Cradle. Click image for article.

Unbounded Grids

I first discovered Ben Butler’s room-sized grid on Colossal and immediately began looking forward to my next trip to Houston so I might see Unbounded myself at the Rice University Gallery. This immersive sculpture retains an organic feel because of its irregular shape and because of its material (over 10,000 pieces of poplar wood) and despite being composed of simple, regular, repeated shapes.

Ben Butler, Ubounded, 2015. Image from Colossal. See link above.

Ben Butler, Unbounded, 2015. Image from Colossal. See link above.

Once you’ve gotten a good look at Unbounded, head over to Butler’s website and take a look at his drawings and prints such as Invention #58 (detail) shown below. These make me wonder how we can make the Pointwise software do that.

Ben Butler, Invention #58 (detail), 2011. Image from BenButlerArt.com. See link above.

Ben Butler, Invention #58 (detail), 2011. Image from BenButlerArt.com. See link above.

BONUS: The science of melting cheese. Because delicious.



Impressions From the Third OpenVSP Workshop

$
0
0

The use of computer-aided design (CAD) software is particularly ill-suited during conceptual design where product development tends to be very open-ended and large changes to the geometry definition are typically required in order to explore a vast design space.  Organizations which use CAD throughout all phases of product development tend to recoup some of the time and resources expended when using traditional CAD packages during conceptual design by their ability to carry the design forward through subsequent design phases.  However, this benefit isn’t necessarily realized for those organizations, or users whose activities don’t span the entire design cycle.  The OpenVSP team at NASA Langley has identified those deficiencies inherent in adapting traditional CAD software packages for use during conceptual design, and they have created a nicely packaged software tool for parametric geometry modeling which accommodates many of CAD’s shortcomings.  The software named Vehicle Sketchpad, otherwise known as OpenVSP, is a freely available download from their website.

OpenVSP generic transport model used for anisotropic unstructured mesh automation using Glyph in Pointwise.

OpenVSP generic transport model used for anisotropic unstructured mesh automation using Glyph in Pointwise.

Earlier last month, NASA Langley hosted their third OpenVSP Workshop 2015 at the National Institute of Aerospace (NIA) in Hampton, VA.  The workshop provided a venue for OpenVSP developers, new, and experienced OpenVSP users alike to share and learn more about the software.  During the workshop a number of sessions provided information ranging from introductory and advanced model building, recent additions to the software, as well as several use cases highlighting how the diverse OpenVSP community has adapted and used OpenVSP for their own purposes.

Through the first day of the workshop, sessions provided a comprehensive introduction to OpenVSP directly from its developers.  The initial morning sessions were used to present the design goals and motivation for continued development of OpenVSP, and these were followed up with introductions of the various 3D parametric modeling operations available within the software.  During the afternoon sessions on the first day, attendees collaborated with presenter Bill Fredericks for a hands-on demonstration wherein OpenVSP was used to create a Predator B model based on a suggestion from one of General Atomics Aeronautical Systems’ employees in attendance.  Publicly available information regarding the aircraft’s design was gathered by those in the audience while Fredericks’ carefully re-created the aircraft within OpenVSP.  In about 45 minutes, the group had put together a fairly representative Predator B aircraft model using the software.

The second and third days of the workshop were reserved for an overview of the physics-based analysis capabilities packaged within OpenVSP.  These include built-in mass properties and aero reference tools, a vortex lattice solver (VSPAero), and an interactive wave drag prediction tool.  Sessions also included a number of presentations from users demonstrating how they have incorporated OpenVSP into their own work.  Highlights included presentations covering rapid aircraft structural modeling, high-lift prediction, and meshing for CFD. Presentations from this year’s OpenVSP workshop can be found at OpenVSP’s Workshop page.

This year OpenVSP developers further improved OpenVSP’s STEP file export feature making it more robust, and they also included support for easily creating blunt trailing edges which typically help improve mesh quality near these localized regions.  Pointwise leveraged these recent enhancements to OpenVSP to demonstrate Pointwise’s automated meshing capabilities.  The generation of an anisotropic viscous surface and volume mesh for a complete generic transport aircraft configuration exported from OpenVSP was fully automated in Pointwise using Glyph.  The Glyph script was written to mesh the configuration using recommended practices while exposing only a limited number of meshing parameters.

Fully meshed generic transport configurations resulting from Glyph automation in Pointwise.

Fully meshed generic transport configurations resulting from Glyph automation in Pointwise.

If you would like to learn more about the Glyph script we put together and the workshop, it is available for download from Pointwise’s Glyph Script Exchange hosted on GitHub.  Also keep an eye out for the next issue of The Connector where more details about the script will be provided.

Pointwise also has an upcoming Glyph Scripting course scheduled for 15 through 17 of September hosted at Pointwise’s office in Fort Worth, TX.  Registration is free to current customers and spots are still available for next week’s class if any are interested in learning more about Glyph.


8 Questions with Chris Sideroff of Applied CCM Canada

$
0
0

Chris Sideroff is the owner and principal director at Applied CCM Canada (www.appliedccm.ca). Applied CCM Canada is the Canadian distributor for Pointwise, offers OpenFOAM-based development and support services, and is the primary developer of the OpenFOAM derivative, Caelus.

What do you see are the biggest challenges facing CFD in the next 3 years?

I think an obvious one is meshing – which means Pointwise is safe for a while. Seriously though, I think a big issue with meshing is a disconnect between what the mesher (software and/or user) creates and what the solver wants. I believe it’s deeper than what mesh adaption can do or has been promising to do (for a quite some time).  Every numerical implementation of a CFD solver has made some assumptions – this is how we discretize the Navier-Stokes equations so they can be solved numerically. One or more of these assumptions always has a geometric consideration; hence the dependency on some characteristic of the mesh elements’ shapes.

As I see it there are two main issues. First, it tends to be very difficult, in a general sense, to identify exactly how much a mesh metric affects solution accuracy. The relationships among the assumptions are non-linear so rarely is there an opportunity to isolate and study the influence of one metric. Second, what, where and how these assumptions are made differs between CFD solvers. It’s kind of like if you don’t know the target you’re aiming for, how do you expect to hit the bulls-eye? In my opinion, it’s going to require much closer collaboration between those who develop meshing software and those who develop solver software. If we can reduce or eliminate the influence of the element shapes on solution accuracy, then there is some hope of significantly reducing the mesh generation burden. Then we can begin to think about things like automation and adaption.

The other big challenge is exploiting parallel architectures. Also let be me clear here and state that I don’t believe “the cloud” is our savior. There is more than enough hardware at our disposal even in a relatively low-cost desk-side workstation but we’re simply not using it.  Traditionally we think of running CFD on the CPU core – one CFD process per core. But within modern workstation there are hundreds and sometimes thousands of unused processing units. I’m using the term unit here very generically. An obvious one you often hear about is general purpose computing on graphics cards, also known as GPGPU computing. There are a few others like multi-threaded cores, co-processors and ISA vector extensions. As an example, I was reading an article on HPCWire that mentioned the upcoming Power9 architecture from IBM would need 2,000 parallel operations at a time to keep a single core busy.

On the flip side, if you look at the www.Top500.org list of fastest supercomputers in the world you will find computers with more than 100,000 cores are commonplace and there are several with over a million. Combine that with what a single core can do and we’ll soon be talking about billion process simulations. Then the trillion cell challenge that Tecplot has posed will not seem so outrageous. In the CFD world, we have only touched the tip of the iceberg about understanding how to exploit all these resources. In this instance I feel the challenge is educating CFD engineers more about computer science so we can better utilize the resources already at our disposal.

John: As you know, I think NASA’s CFD Vision 2030 Study is a very comprehensive assessment of where CFD is today versus where we need it to be in the year 2030. Meshing and exascale computing were only two of the things they cited. How do you feel about the report overall? Did they get it right? Did they miss anything?

Chris: In the context of CFD for aerospace I think they got it right. I say in the context of aerospace because I’m sure CFD users in this field, particularly in the U.S. who have access to many of the excellent aero-centric CFD codes, may disagree with my point about the disconnect between mesh quality and solution accuracy. My argument was more general, in the context of CFD usage in more than one industry that use commercial or openly available solvers, where mesh quality can be a barrier to robustness and reliability.

In regard to my parallel computing comment, I think my point of the available parallel resources at the desktop is not addressed. One of their grand challenges was a large eddy simulation of a full-scale aircraft across the flight envelope. Clearly, that’s only going to be possible on the largest supercomputer available at the time, even by 2030. The overwhelming usage of CFD is still going to occur on the desktop so it seems to me even small improvements in the bigger portion of the “usage pie” would lead to more profound improvements in the applicability of CFD.

My general feeling is it was an excellent report that demonstrates leadership both from NASA as a leader in aerodynamics and for aerodynamics as a leader for CFD. While maybe it’s not applicable to all areas of CFD, it should prove to be a good reference point for other industries.

What are you currently working on?

We are working madly to complete our next release of Caelus, 5.10 (www.caelus-cml.com). Caelus is our fork of OpenFOAM. The first release was about bringing open-source CFD to Mac and Windows. The second release was about improving numerical aspects, in particular improving accuracy near walls and reducing sensitivity to mesh quality. We also added new infrastructure based on Python that will make it much easier to use and automate Caelus. The upcoming release, slated for this October, among other things will reintroduce of compressible solvers and turbulence models, the majority of which were written from scratch. OpenFOAM is not known for its compressible capabilities so we took some time to develop some new solvers that should improve that reputation.

CAELUS-logo

Aside from that I am also quite busy working with our Pointwise customers. When I get questions from customers, I like diving in with their meshing projects, particularly if scripting is involved.

I’ve also been spending time trying to raise awareness of Applied CCM and Pointwise throughout Canada. One in particular is Pointwise’s #TutorialTuesday on Twitter, where Pointwise tips, tricks, and tutorials are posted every Tuesday. Through this, I’ve created a couple of videos demonstrating meshing a submarine hull geometry with both structured and unstructured techniques. I plan on using these meshes in some Caelus tutorials as well.

sub-hull-struc-tut

Structured grid for a submarine hull

I am continually working on several projects involving Caelus and OpenFOAM. Applied CCM conducts a significant amount of internal research and development on new solvers, tools and methods. Things like our adjoint solver useful for shape optimization, our tangent solver useful for parameter optimization, and our high-speed transient solver that is significantly faster and more scalable than traditional transient solvers, are examples of technologies that have come out of our internal development projects.

John: OK, I have to ask. Why does the world need another variant of OpenFOAM? Where do you think Caelus fits into the OpenFOAM galaxy and the overall CFD universe? More directly, why would I want to use Caelus for my CFD versus something else?

Chris: Would it come as a shock to you that we’ve have been asked this question before? To which I usually reply with our technical reasons for doing so but perhaps I’ll take the opportunity to give some more philosophical reasons.

There is a general lack of cohesiveness among the development and use of OpenFOAM. To explain why I say this let me start with some context. For an open-source project to be successful, both in the terms of technical ability and social health, the process for making decisions must be transparent. It does not necessarily need to be democratic – simply transparent. You often hear the term “benevolent dictator” applied to leaders of many of the larger projects. Linus Torvalds of Linux and Guido van Rossum of Python are two good examples. There needs to exist a dynamic two-way dialog between the maintainer and the community. The maintainer makes decisions unilaterally but like any successful leader they do so while at least heeding their user’s advice and feedback. As I see it, this does not occur with OpenFOAM or if it does it is not obvious.

The community around OpenFOAM is vibrant and continually growing but there is little communication between the maintainers of OpenFOAM and the community. So there’s all these people doing what they love around OpenFOAM but because there’s no dialogue and legitimate way of contributing ideas back, there is a lot of fragmentation. Furthermore, because OpenFOAM provides no proof of verification, validation or algorithmic code review, the community is left to do so on their own leading to further fragmentation. In my opinion, this lack of cohesiveness is significantly hampering it. As you mention, there are other OpenFOAM projects but I have yet to see the cohesiveness I was speaking to like you see in other successful open-source projects. At least that’s how I see it.

We hope to change that model with Caelus. We try to have an open, two-way dialogue with users. For users that have developed their own extensions to Caelus, provided they’ve been satisfactorily tested and documented, we will happily add them to the distribution. We also do not require reassignment of copyright of the contributed code. Verification, validation, and code review is part of our Caelus development process now – and we are open about it. The plan is to make test cases from the tutorials so that when a user looks to a tutorial as a guideline, those settings are relevant rather than only applicable to trivial cases. We started this already but will take some time to develop a significant body of test cases and documentation. As a community around Caelus grows, we may look to the community to help maintain certain portions of it but ultimately we will remain the benevolent dictators.

So that was the ideological thought process. Why would people want to use Caelus? First, it is built, tested and supported on Linux, Mac and Windows. It’s no secret the most prevalent desktop OS is Windows so those people were getting no love from OpenFOAM. Yes, there are a number of projects that have enabled OpenFOAM on Windows but many require the user to figure out how to compile it and again were not officially supported by OpenFOAM. The development environment on Windows is far different from on Unix-based operating systems so what compiles on Linux can be very difficult to compile on Windows. And most users probably don’t even want to bother compiling the software – as users they’re perfectly happy with binaries. This was our assumption when making this decision, now validated since the initial release of Caelus where Windows downloads outnumber the other two platforms 2 to 1.

OpenFOAM is known to be sensitive to mesh quality. There are schemes and settings available to counteract this – which often don’t help – but because the documentation and tutorials are so limiting, users are often immediately turned off. So unless you have an expert at your disposal, getting even converged solutions can be an exercise in futility. The second release of Caelus was a first step in remedying this. I’m not going to profess to you that all the issues can be fixed and will work on every case in one release but it’s a step in the right direction. There are a few other items that contribute to mesh sensitivity and it will take us a little longer to develop and test. I would also like to mention, that we release Caelus bi-annually – April and October – to keep things moving forward at a predictable pace. The version numbers reflect that. The first was 4.10 for Oct 2014, the second was 5.04 for last April, 5.10 for this October and so on.

John: Thanks for your candor and transparency, to use your word. I’m hoping this incites a dialog in the comments on this article.

How did you get to be where you are today?

I grew up in a really small town in northwestern Alberta, Canada (find Edmonton on a map and go northwest until you stop seeing civilization). Particularly, since I grew up before the internet got going, I wasn’t exposed to much outside of hockey. I do recall always having a love for airplanes and pretty much anything that flew. Plus, I was naturally good at math and science.

My path to getting into CFD wasn’t exactly direct. Out of high school, I started my freshman year of engineering in a local college that had a transfer program to the University of Alberta for subsequent years. That year didn’t go so well and I was asked to rethink my future as an engineer. The petroleum industry in Alberta at the time was booming so I got a job as a truck driver on a frack crew (yes, the so-called “evil” fracking you hear of in the news regularly). To make a long story shorter, after a couple of years as a truck driver, I had a rare moment of clarity where I decided that wasn’t the life for me anymore. I quit within a week. I also want to mention that being a truck driver is not a bad thing – I actually liked doing it, learned a ton and worked with a lot of great people – but it just didn’t jive with the expectations I had for myself.

I managed to get back into engineering school and eventually enrolled in the Mechanical Engineering program at the University of Alberta in Edmonton and graduated in 2000 with honors. During my senior year, as I was thinking about join the work force, I found myself a little disillusioned with the types of jobs available in Alberta. Nearly all my classmates were moving on to very prosperous careers in the petroleum industry but the aero-itch was still there for me. As fate would have it, during the final semester of my degree, the instructor in my compressible flow course, Dr. Jeff Yokota, suggested I consider grad school. Jeff was a totally unconventional professor – think long hair, many earrings, plaid unbuttoned shirt with a plain T-shirt, jeans and sneakers [John: Sounds like every math professor I had.] – but for whatever reason he resonated with me. Before becoming a professor, Jeff was a CFD researcher at NASA Glenn (then called Lewis) so he had lots of cool stories, knowledge, and experiences to share. So grad school with Jeff working on CFD was an obvious choice. I finished my MSc in 2003 which was about developing inverse design methods for axial turbomachinery cascades using CFD.

That work lead to me my PhD in Syracuse. While that’s what led me there, I ended up working on something completely different (applying CFD in the indoor environment). It still of course involved CFD but with commercial software instead of in-house developed codes. In retrospect, the opportunity to try many different approaches and tools was the best thing for me. Although there was no way I knew it at the time, probably the most influential aspect on how I got to where I am today was Gridgen. That was how you and I were introduced.

Simulation of the personal micro-environment.

Simulation of the personal micro-environment.

John: Because I’m an Orangeman (Syracuse class of 1984), Pointwise has been providing my alma mater with free software for many years. And when I was on campus for an engineering career fair, that’s when you and I met. One thing led to another and you began work at Pointwise.

Who or what inspired you to get started in your career?

I hope no one I know takes offense to this but probably no one but myself. There are many who have helped me get where I am but I honestly feel my passion for science, math, computers and fluid dynamics is just part of my genetic makeup.

What advice do you have for young people entering the field today?

Here’s some advice I gave that helped a new graduate student at one of the local universities get a job in our field.

Be motivated to learn about and be good at many things. We all have our one or two passions but it’s important to have a broad skill set.  Things like learning to program. Don’t learn one. Learn as many as you can. Low level languages like C and C++ and high level languages like Python and Tcl/Tk are good to know in our field. I should note, while Matlab is OK for simple analysis and data post-processing, you do not learn about the science of computing with it (hardware operation, memory management, IO, numerical methods (see below). That and it’s horrifically slow. Another one is the Linux operating system. It is very common in the CFD world, it’s free and easy to install.

Be interested in the fundamentals of numerical methods. Things like quadrature, interpolation, root finding, Lagrangian vs Eulerian, linear and non-linear systems form the foundation of the finite element method, finite volume method and others. By the way, having a thorough understanding of linear algebra (non-linear systems are converted to linear ones so it all ends up being linear) is a very desirable knowledge skill. Learn about the FEM, FVM and finite difference method, or even Lattice Boltzmann. These methods form the foundation of numerical analysis software such as ANSYS (FEM), Fluent (FVM) or PowerFLOW (LBM). You don’t see FDM much anymore but it’s good to be aware of it. If you really want to roll your sleeves up and get dirty, take a look at Caelus or OpenFOAM.

While it’s good to have experience with commercial CAE software, it’s important to have at least a cursory understanding of what’s inside them. You don’t just want to be a “crank turner.” Even if your passion is designing fluid systems, and the software is simply one tool of many, understanding how it works will make you much more productive and enable you to make better decisions about the results. I use the “garbage in, garbage out” analogy with CFD a lot. Just because it can produce pretty pictures doesn’t mean it’s correct. In fact, more times than not the results will be wrong. One has to work hard to get a “right” one.

I’ve seen what employers look for in candidates and they want someone that’s worth the money. Engineers with graduate degrees who work with CFD, typically expect higher salaries. That means employers commensurately demand more out of them and will be more cautious about who they hire. Because hiring people in these fields is a bigger investment, the risk to the company goes up. Clearly someone who can do many diverse tasks has more value and therefore the potential to reward the company’s investment goes up.

John: You realize I was able to graduate from Syracuse with an undergraduate degree in engineering without taking any linear algebra, right?

Chris:  I’m surprised it wasn’t a required course.

John: Seriously, when it comes to hiring new college grads, my approach has been that skills can be taught; therefore, hire for aptitude. In other words, learn the fundamentals, learn how to learn, and you’ll be a strong candidate. Plus be a solid communicator.

Chris: I totally agree with that statement. The role of university is to learn how to learn. My advice about “skills to learn” are topics you should learn on your own. That’s the beauty of grad school – it offers the freedom and flexibility to develop skills while you learn. I am not sure it’s necessarily the role of the employer to teach those skills but having any of these sure looks good to an employer. Let’s not even open a discussion about the generally abhorrent writing and communication skills most engineers have.

How do you know Pointwise?

The company/people: I used to work there. The software: I used Gridgen in graduate school.

John: I think it’s important to make readers aware that you left because you had an entrepreneurial itch you wanted to scratch and a desire to do more programming. It would’ve been great if you were still here.

Chris: That’s right. I had a lot of fun working at Pointwise and have a lot of respect for the people and company.

Can you share with us your favorite tools and resources that help you get your job done?

Linux and in particular a Bash shell: Honestly, I don’t know how people develop software without it. By the way, you’re a lunatic if you’re using a C shell. Korn shell and zsh are OK though.

Stack Overflow: Honestly, I don’t know how people develop software without it or even before the internet.

Pointwise: Honestly, I don’t know how people make meshes without it.

Vim: Honestly … I need not say more.

Everything else I have an open mind about.

If we were to visit you, where’s a good place to go out for dinner?

I haven’t fully explored Ottawa’s eatery scene but there’s an excellent vegetarian restaurant called the Green Door on Main St near St. Joseph’s College. I’ve taken the most hardened carnivores there and they’ve all given it the thumbs up, including myself. Ottawa has an almost ridiculous number of Shawarma restaurants so if Mediterranean food blows your hair back you’d be in heaven here.

John: I was hoping for a poutine recommendation.

Chris: Right, I forgot about your affinity for it. So far the best poutine I’ve had are at what they call here “chip shacks” –your typical little mom-and-pop burger joint. My favorite so far is Casse-Croute Limbour on Rue St. Louise in Gatineau, QC along the Gatineau River near the Chelsea dams.

John: OK, I guess veggies it is the next time I come to visit. Thanks for taking the time for all these questions.


I’m John Dreese and This Is How I Mesh

$
0
0
John Dreese, Senior Engineer on the Technical Support Team.

John Dreese, Senior Engineer on the Technical Support Team.

If America was a Ping Pong table, I would be the ball. I grew up in Ohio, bounced out to California during the dotcom implosion, bounced back to Ohio to work at a wind tunnel, and finally bounced down to Texas where I’ve been for 13 years. Everything you’ve heard about Texas is true. It is a dry heat. Houses are cheap. Individuals can be all hat, yet have no cattle.

I grew up in Columbus, Ohio. My parents encouraged me to follow my interests which tended towards airplanes at a young age. I eventually attended The Ohio State University where I earned both a Bachelors and Master’s degree in Aeronautical Engineering. As a student there, I also worked part time at the OSU Aero/Astro Research Laboratory. I got to see how the sausage was made, doing everything from milling model parts on the Bridgeport to calibrating wind tunnel instrumentation using mercury! During that time, I also worked at Beechwold Ace Hardware. I credit that experience with teaching me how to help customers.

My proudest moment at OSU was being part of the team that built and raced a human powered vehicle during the 1994 International Human Powered Vehicle Association (IHPVA) Championship held in Eureka, California.  Our vehicle was called the Buckeye Bullet and it was fast. To keep the weight down, we built it out of fiberglass, Kevlar and aluminum. We had a crushing defeat that involved, unfortunately, a parked Ford F-150. The whole project was one of the best learning experiences I’ve ever had.

The Buckeye Bullet human powered vehicle built and raced in the 1994 International Human Powered Vehicle Association Championship.

The Buckeye Bullet human powered vehicle built and raced in the 1994 International Human Powered Vehicle Association Championship.

For graduate school, I worked on two projects. The first was a wind tunnel study of tail icing effects on a de Havilland DHC-6 Twin Otter; this even involved a short stint at Cleveland’s NASA Glenn where the flight testing took place. If you want to read the final report, you can get it here (yes, my one and only NASA publication and my name is spelled wrong on the coversheet).

The second and most important project in graduate school was the focus of my Master’s thesis: elliptical airfoils. The unique advantage of elliptical airfoils is that their performance is independent of whether the air is coming or going. I ran transonic wind tunnel tests and CFD analyses for our candidate airfoils. The whole research project was in support of the Boeing X-50 Dragonfly program, an experimental canard-rotor-wing (CRW) aircraft.  Two prototypes were built and flown. They both crashed and the program was cancelled in 2006.

The Boeing X-50 Dragonfly canard-rotor-wing aircraft.

The Boeing X-50 Dragonfly canard-rotor-wing aircraft.

In the moments between graduate school projects, I started a fun shareware software project called the Super Numerical Airfoil Creation Kit, or SNACK for short. I eventually changed the name to DesignFOIL. The goal was a simple Windows software tool that would automagically generate NACA airfoil coordinates for wings and then run them through a virtual wind tunnel. The project is still going strong today.

My first long-term job in the real world was at Lockheed Martin Aeronautics in Fort Worth, Texas.  I was a store separation engineer for ten years, starting on the F-16, moving to the F-22, then ending up in Advanced Development Programs (i.e. The Skunkworks). My goal was to make sure that anything dropped from a high-speed airplane didn’t “float” back and destroy the airplane. I was honored to receive a Lockheed Aero Star Award in 2011 for some store separation simulations I did that saved the customer a few bucks.

In addition to the fun aviation-related stuff, I wrote an adventure novel called Red Hope after being inspired by the Mars Curiosity rover landing in 2012. The process of turning a one-page idea into a 58,000 word novel was very educational. I’ve clawed my way up to 12,475 on the Amazon best seller list; the guy in 12,474th place is proving to be a formidable challenger.

In 2012, a rare opportunity came up to join the Pointwise team. My work here has allowed me to expound upon the CFD roots that I established in graduate school. Grid generation is really the foundation for any good CFD solution, so it has to be done right. The subject of grid generation is pretty big, so I’m learning something new every day.  One of the cool benefits of being at Pointwise is that I get to meet a lot of great people who are working on fascinating projects.

  • Location: Fort Worth, Texas
  • Current position: Senior Engineer
  • Current computer: Windows7 64-bit, Xeon CPU @ 2GHz, 12GB of RAM
  • One word that best describes how you work: Easygoing

What software or tools do you use every day?

I use Pointwise every day, all day. For ancillary tasks, I use Outlook, Excel and Word.  For DIY videos, I use Snagit to perform screen captures and PowerDirector to edit the Pointwise tutorial videos. For graphics generation, I use a combination of Paint Shop Pro and Paintbrush (yes, the Windows default). Believe it or not, I still use Notepad quite a bit too.

What does your workspace look like?

John's current workspace.

John’s current workspace.

My desk is in a state of organized clutter. I know where everything is and which stack it’s in. My main monitor doubles as a post-it note holder. My desk is the last stop on the technical magazine rounds, so I literally have a Magazine Mountain on my desk with occasional avalanches.

What are you currently working on?

My regular work involves helping our customers use Pointwise in the most efficient manner possible. This involves answering daily questions, teaching our training classes, and producing tutorials for the software.

What would you say is your meshing specialty?

Between the two major styles of gridding, unstructured is definitely my strong suite. However, I’m working on a structured grid project to help refine my skills in that area.  If I had a specialty here, it would probably be software installation, which is no small task if you consider how many operating systems we support. Somebody once said that I could install Pointwise on a potato. That was probably exaggeration.

Any tips for our users?

If you run into an issue that is holding back your progress, please contact us immediately.  Email us at support@pointwise.com or call us at 1-800-4PTWISE. We are here to answer your questions from 8:00am to 5:00pm. If you don’t contact me, I’ll be forced to finally deal with Magazine Mountain or waste time trying to install Pointwise on taters.

What project are you most proud of and why?

I’m proud of the video tutorials that we make.  These seem to be very popular and we have a lot lined up for production. I’m also proud of the features that I’ve helped get put into Pointwise. Probably the one you might recognize is the orient command for structured domains.

What CFD solver and postprocessor do you use most often?

I get to tinker with a lot of codes throughout the customer support process. With regard to solvers, that includes the likes of Fluent and OpenFOAM mostly.  The same goes for postprocessors.  Depending on what the customer is working with, I’ll find myself using Tecplot, EnSight,  ParaView, etc…

Are you reading any interesting technical papers we should know about?

It’s not exactly a paper, but John D. Anderson Jr.’s “A History of Aerodynamics” is perfect for anybody interested in why aeronautical engineering looks the way it does.

Do you plan on attending any conferences or workshops this year?

I just attended the Metacomp (CFD++) Symposium in Pasadena, CA.  I usually attend one of the AIAA conferences every other year. This year I was at the AIAA Aviation conference in Dallas.

What do you do when you’re not generating meshes?

When I’m not at Pointwise, my spare time is spread among three things. My family first and foremost. My wife and I spend a lot of time with our children, trying to get them excited about learning. Second is my hobby airfoil software called DesignFOIL. Lastly is my budding attempt at authoring a novel called Red Hope. Oh, and the Rubik’s Cube: I’ve been a speed cuber for about ten years with my average solve time running around 60 seconds. At one point, I was the 649th fastest cuber in the world.

What is some of the best CFD advice you’ve ever received?

Get Pointwise.  And make sure double-precision graphics is enabled (Edit/Preferences/Graphics).

If you had to pick a place to have dinner, where would you go?

I have two little children, so my restaurant needs are simple.  However, the best place for a 10th anniversary dinner is the Reatta Restaurant in downtown Fort Worth. For all other occasions, there is Subway.


This Week in CFD

$
0
0

Do you feel the buzz in the air? That’s anticipation of next week’s International Meshing Roundtable in Austin, Texas. Maybe that’s why there’s so much meshing in the news this week.

Visualization & Software

  • CADENS wants your sci viz images and videos for use in documentaries for wide public distribution. Submissions are due 30 November 2015.
  • Formula 1 is debating a ban on wind tunnel testing meaning that aerodynamic design would be based entirely on CFD. [Debate: wise or foolish?]
  • A new version of Mesh2Surface, a Rhino plugin for converting 3D scanned meshes to a CAD model, is now available.
  • Beta CAE released v16.0.1 of their software suite.

Reading & Watching

Screen capture from a video of an XFlow simulation of pilot ejection. Click image for video.

Screen capture from a video of an XFlow simulation of pilot ejection. Click image for video.

Events

  • At next year’s European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Science and Engineering (ECCOMAS 2016, 5-10 June 2016, Crete) there are several mini-symposia for mesh generation: cut and composite meshes, adaption, curved/high-order meshing, and meshing for industrial applications. Abstracts are now being accepted with a due date of 29 November.
  • The Code_Saturne User Meeting 2016 will be held on 01 April in Chatou, France.
CFD is being used to design floating liquid natural gas rigs. Image from Engineer Live. Click image for article.

CFD is being used to design floating liquid natural gas rigs. Image from Engineer Live. Click image for article.

World’s Largest 3D Printed Mesh

OK, so they didn’t set out to 3D print a mesh but architects from the Lab for Creative Design have been recognized by the folks at Guinness (world records, not beer) for the world’s largest 3D printed architectural pavilion.

On display in a shopping mall as part of Beijing Design Week, VULCAN consists of 1,023 individual 3D printed parts that are fit together into a structure about 8 meters wide and 3 meters tall.

Of course, all I see is a mesh.

VULCAN, the world's largest 3D printed architectural pavilion. Image from Beijing Design Week. See link above.

VULCAN, the world’s largest 3D printed architectural pavilion. Image from Beijing Design Week. See link above.

As originally seen on SolidSmack. Click through and you can also see 3D printed “fashions.”


This Week in CFD

$
0
0

Software

  • DAAT Research released Coolit v.15.
  • Kitware released ParaView 4.4.
  • Did you ever run out of graph paper? You can print your own customizable grid paper using Gridzzly.com.
  • Van Oossanen Naval Architects’ growing CFD services was part of the reason behind their rebranding as [just plain ol] Van Oossanen.
  • SHIPFLOW is now available on the ReScale platform.
  • Altair released SimLab 14.0, their highly automated FEA modeling environment.
Our friends at CD-adapco will probably love this polyhedron grid paper from Gridzzly.

Our friends at CD-adapco will probably love this polyhedron grid paper from Gridzzly.

Cloud & Mobile

  • CFD Engine jumps on the “Uber for X” bandwagon by asking whether we need an Uber for CFD. It’s an interesting contrast to cloud-based apps that suppose access to hardware and software is the bottleneck. An Uber for CFD supposes that expertise is the bottleneck. [The article uses the term “punter” but in a way that leads me to believe they’re not talking about the football kicker.]
  • Students can get free, cloud-based access to Altair HyperWorks by filling out a brief form to become an Altair University User.
  • simulationHub is a new cloud-based fluid flow simulation CFD app for designers.
  • One of my concerns about CAD/CFD/meshing on mobile (i.e. touch screen) devices is accuracy and precision. Siemens PLM Software’s Catchbook seems to have addressed some of those issues for sketching.
  • I recently posted here a link to the results of the Worldwide CAD Trends 2015 survey in which we see simulation way up in the “high importance, high usage” quadrant [huzzah] and other things including cloud-based CAD down in the “low importance, low usage” quadrant. But the Beyond PLM blog says that’s OK and goes on to introduce a wonderful variant of a Henry Ford quote [that I will shamelessly steal].
Can any of my aero friends shed some light (no pun intended) on the F-16 Scamp, shown here in a NASA wind tunnel in the early 90s? Image from IO9. Click image for link.

Can any of my aero friends shed some light (no pun intended) on the F-16 Scamp, shown here in a NASA wind tunnel in the early 90s? Image from io9. Click image for link.

Events and Applications

Velocity contours of fan-driven flow around a plant tray in a vertical farm. Image from Design News. See link above.

Velocity contours of fan-driven flow around a plant tray in a vertical farm. Image from Design News. See link above.

A Faceted Halloween

I’m actually pleasantly surprised to have found for sharing here a piece of mesh-like fine art with a Halloween twist. [Please note: the Halloween tie-in is one of my own making and is not a value judgment or demeaning of the artwork.]

Artist Stephanie Calvert used materials found in her parents’ dilapidated, rural Colorado home to create works that helped her process her upbringing and her mother’s recent accident. Exploring themes of order and chaos, works in her Shame to Pride exhibition will open in NYC on 12 November.

You can see and hear Ms. Calvert’s story in a video she produced about Shame to Pride.

Stephanie Calvert, Third Life, 2014. See link above.

Stephanie Calvert, Third Life, 2014. See link above.

If you can’t see the Halloween theme in the image above either squint at it or scale down the image.


This Week in CFD

$
0
0

Special “Black Friday” Edition

Software

  • Exa announced a patent-pending methodology for identifying noise sources in aeroacoustic simulations.
  • MSC Software released Marc 2015 for non-linear FEA simulations.
  • From Warsaw comes QuickerSim, a CFD consultancy and makers of the CFD Toolbox for MATLAB.
  • Symscape writes about why integrated meshing is a good thing.
  • FEA for All delves into the topic of proper mesh density.
  • Desktop Engineering shares information on Altair’s SimLab 14.0.
Thanks to Mentor Graphics for the simulated turkey roasting for Thanksgiving. Click image for article.

Thanks to Mentor Graphics for the simulated turkey roasting for Thanksgiving. Click image for article.

News

  • IDC makes a few predictions about changes coming to software licensing in 2016 and #4 caught my eye: at least 3 software providers will announce their intent to end perpetual licensing. [You’ve read here before “Software licensing models have to change.” Is this it?]
  • A recording of Flow Science’s recent webinar What’s New in FLOW-3D v11.1 is available online for you to watch. (Registration required.)

Would a Programmer by Any Other Name Smell as Sweet?

Earlier this month, an article in The Atlantic cause a bit of a stir when it asked programmers to stop calling themselves engineers. The essence of their argument as I understand it is that engineering is a profession built upon well-founded principles so as to properly serve the public trust. While reading the article I was reminded of the old joke that if engineers designed and constructed buildings the way programmers design and build programs, we’d all be living in caves.

In rebuttal, the folks at GrabCAD wrote Software Engineering is Engineering. Their argument as far as I can tell is that engineering is a systematic approach to design that focuses on practicality, safety, and resiliency. (Actually, there is debate within academia about exactly what software engineering is and implies.)

It’s pretty clear to me that The Atlantic is talking about engineer as a noun while GrabCAD is talking about engineer as a verb. (In fact, that distinction is made somewhere in one of the articles.) Keeping in mind that I’m an engineer by education (admitted bias), it’s my opinion that you shouldn’t have a job title of engineer unless you’ve graduated from an ABET-accredited engineering program. Whether or not you’re a licensed professional engineer (PE) takes being an engineer to a new level and we could debate all day whether all engineers could, should, or must be licensed as PEs.

GrabCAD’s counter argument that a Facebook outage is no big deal compared to a building collapse strains credibility. After all, if Facebook with their resources can’t get this programming thing right, who can? But citing Facebook is also a bit of a red herring; how about hackable medical devices like pacemakers? How much engineering do you want in those?

Is it possible to be a good programmer without an engineering degree? Certainly. Is it possible to be a competent programmer by working within an engineered process? Yes. Can you be an engineer and a lousy programmer? Indeed you can.

But you’re not an engineer without the degree. And that’s not a value judgement relative to programmers and software developers.  After all, a computer scientist isn’t an engineer either.

And don’t get me started on “Sanitation Engineers.”

"HVAC Volume visualization of flow-induced noise sources using Exa PowerACOUSTICS' patent-pending FIND module." Image from Global News Wire. See link above.

“HVAC Volume visualization of flow-induced noise sources using Exa PowerACOUSTICS’ patent-pending FIND module.” Image from Global News Wire. See link above.

Gallery of Fluid Motion 2015

From the recently concluded 2015 meeting of the American Physical Society Division of Fluid Dynamics meeting comes this video collection of the Gallery of Fluid Motion, 77 brief videos to which you can geek out and git yer flow on.

One that caught my eye is illustrated below, a computational laboratory for the study of transitional and turbulent boundary layers by Jin Lee at Johns Hopkins.

Screen capture from Jin Lee's video of a computational boundary layer lab. Click image for video.

Screen capture from Jin Lee’s video of a computational boundary layer lab. Click image for video.

But I really enjoyed A Day in the Life of a Fluid Dynamicist from Reckinger, Reckinger, and Owkes at Montana State and Rua from Fairfield. Nicely done. [I hope you got interviewed by FYFD while at APS DFD because I think people will want to learn more about you all.]


I’m Jim Colby and This Is How I Mesh

$
0
0
Jim Colby, Senior Engineer on the Product Development Team.

Jim Colby, Senior Engineer on the Product Development Team.

While originally from Illinois (Waukegan for you Jack Benny fans), I grew in foggy Santa Maria, CA. So, I know BBQ – specifically Santa Maria Style BBQ and even helped my dad build a ‘spec’ Santa Maria BBQ pit. Even with that, I have come to appreciate Texas BBQ (see below).

My early career plans centered around becoming a naval officer on a fleet ballistic missile or fast attack nuclear submarine. So, at UCLA, I first majored in nuclear engineering. When I learned from my roommate that the Navy doesn’t like non-Naval Academy nuclear engineers, I switched to mechanical engineering. When I found out I didn’t like mechanical engineering and found electrical engineering much easier, I switched again.  When I finally realized my severe motion sickness would be a problem, it was time for a land-based career.

I did get to work as a nuclear survivability engineer on the Navy’s Trident II missile at Lockheed for a number of years. Running bomb codes, testing electronics, analyzing EMP coupling of missile exhaust plumes and participating in an underground nuclear test were some of the fun things I got to work on while I taught myself C and C++. Ah, programming – now that was and is fun. Instant feedback, creating new code, making machines do my bidding – what’s not to like? I’ve worked on the system software for KLA-Tencor’s reticle inspection machines (front-end semiconductor manufacturing), Electroglas’ strip-test handler (back-end semiconductor manufacturing) and FEI’s focused ion beam microscopes (semiconductor failure analysis).

While at Lockheed, I completed a MS in Computational Physics, but didn’t use it much in the ensuing years. So, when a position opened up at Pointwise in 2010 (Carolyn Woeber, the Customer Support Manager here at Pointwise, is married to my wife’s brother), I jumped at the chance to work on a great scientific software package with great people.

  • Location: Fort Worth, TX
  • Current position: Senior Engineer, Product Development
  • Current computer: Windows 8.1 workstation (Intel i7-860 2.80 GHz x 4, 16 GB, Dual Monitors, Nvidia GeForce GT 220), Filco mechanical keyboard (Cherry brown switches)
  • Current headphones/amp: Oppo PM-3 w/FiiO X3ii
  • One word that best describes how you work: Focused

What software or tools do you use every day?

While others might use imitators or pretenders, I use the one and only Emacs, the god of editors. As a colleague of mine once said, “Once you’re in Emacs, there’s no need to leave”. However, I do make concessions (I was an engineer first, then a physicist) so I also use Microsoft’s Visual Studio (with Emacs key bindings, of course). I can easily switch between Emacs for editing and Visual Studio for compiling, debugging and a bit o’ editing. The remapping of the keyboard I’ve done to make Windows more like a Sun workstation is handy as well and it confuses the heck out of people using my machine. We use Perforce for version control here at Pointwise, which is quite refreshing from my years under ClearCase’s somewhat heavy-handed version of version control. For issue tracking YouTrack is fantastic, and TeamCity manages our build system (18 build/test agents, each on a different OS platform). Cygwin works great for the command-line and for interfacing with our Linux- and Mac OS X-based machines. Outlook and Firefox/Chrome pretty much complete the list.

What does your workspace look like?

Jim's current workspace.

Jim’s current workspace.

Jim's bookshelf.

Jim’s bookshelf.

My workspace is a bit, shall we say, crowded. Two monitors, phone, coffee mugs, planner, keyboard, assorted cables, phone/tablet/headphones, you get the picture, like the one above. On the wall is a nicely framed map of London, circa 1920. I also have a table behind me that takes up any overflow – more coffee mugs, books, magazines, water bottle, lunch bag – sorry, no picture.

What are you currently working on?

I was originally hired on to help with an Air Force contract integrating overset meshing capabilities into Pointwise. Nowadays it’s primarily getting V18 ready for production: addressing bugs, adding new features, expanding some existing features and testing.

What would you say is your meshing specialty?

That’s a great question. One for which I have an answer. None. I do build meshes while testing Pointwise in order to pin-point code defects, and if it’s not in the meshing algorithms, I’m all over it. Fortunately for me, there’s more to this world-class meshing tool than algorithms, and I get to help make those algorithms as useful as possible.

Any tips for our users?

You’ve made the best choice in CFD meshing software – unless you aren’t using Pointwise. Use it. Learn Glpyh. Make use of our awesome customer support – only the biggest customers received support directly from the developers at my previous employers – here at Pointwise, not only are our customer support engineers meshing experts, they are mere feet away from us developers and aren’t afraid to involve us should the need arise for any customer.

What project are you most proud of and why?

The overset meshing project I was originally hired for is certainly up there. I developed a nifty XML parsing engine that created user input dialogs at runtime so that future changes to the overset meshing codes we support would be nearly seamless. Some others would be the UV highlighter Examine function and Rules extensions (entity associations).

What CFD solver and postprocessor do you use most often?

Well, as for CFD solvers, that would be the one I wrote. A fabulous 2D shock wave solver I wrote for a grad school homework assignment that only had one tiny error. Still got an A, though. Since then, I haven’t used any and don’t really need to with my current work.

Are you reading any interesting technical papers we should know about?

Well, that’s classified. If I told you, I have to… you know. All kidding aside, I’m reading Geometry Modeling, by Michael Mortenson to get up to speed on, uh, geometry modeling.

Do you plan on attending any conferences or workshops next year?

I attended the C++Now conference last year and I’ll try to attend another C++ related conference this next year, and possibly another International Meshing Roundtable conference.

What do you do when you’re not generating meshes?

Time with my family is important since my kids are almost out of the house – we all climbed Half Dome in Yosemite National Park this past summer – I like to do it every 10 years. Cooking with my wife is always fun as we rarely eat out and rarely have the same meal twice – I’m the sous while she makes the meal magic. I also apparently enjoy keeping old laptop computers alive and living on Windows 10. I used to be addicted to pushups – my goal was to do 1,000 a day. But, I got stuck at 375 and gave up. These days, I run a few miles 2-3 days a week, and do a more modest 180 pushups and 36 pullups every other day to stay in shape for my real passion – coding for Pointwise.

What is some of the best CFD advice you’ve ever received?

Mesh early and often – wait – I get that confused with the ‘vote early and vote often’ quote… Since my career has only lately been CFD-related, I haven’t received any advice I’d call ‘best’. However, CFD analysis is probably like anything else – spend quality time up front on your project (i.e., build a great mesh with Pointwise) and the rest should just fall into place.

If you had to pick a place to have dinner, where would you go?

Café Pasqual’s in Santa Fe, NM. For BBQ, Franklin’s in Austin, TX is tough to beat, but be prepared to wait in line. For 3 hours. And do not fill up on their ‘samples’. In San Jose, CA, the Falafel Drive In is excellent – large falafel with their hot sauce and a banana shake. For steak, I still prefer Jocko’s in Nipomo, CA, just north of my home town – nothing fancy, just great steaks, beans and garlic bread.



I’m Brenna Jobe and This Is How I Mesh

$
0
0
Brenna Jobe, Receptionist at Pointwise.

Brenna Jobe, Receptionist at Pointwise.

I have an appreciation for the math and engineering behind grid generation. My love of math and engineering came from my dad, Pop. When I was four, my mom moved my sister and me to Texas from Georgia to live with our new dad. He is a mechanical engineer and that made for interesting math homework discussions. I learned quickly how to interpret his tech speak into regular math steps that my mom could help my little sister translate into 2nd grade basics. This dynamic allowed me to foster a passion for teaching that The University of Texas at Arlington helped me turn into a Bachelor of Science in Interdisciplinary Studies with a grade 4-8 Math/Science certification. Though my true “nerd-heart,” as my mother so lovingly calls it, is to teach math, I taught three years of high school Biology in Arlington.

After dealing with freshmen for that long I was ready for a change. My then-boyfriend-now-husband, Chris Jobe, told me about Pointwise having a position open at the front desk. I shortly thereafter met with Rose Mary and Carrie. I started working here in August and have only just recently truly figured out what meshing is and why it is so awesome!

  • Location: Fort Worth
  • Current position: Receptionist
  • Current computer: Dell Vostro 460, Intel Core i5-2400 3.10 GHz, 6 GB RAM, Windows 8.1
  • One word that best describes how you work: Creatively

What software or tools do you use every day?

I use Microsoft Office products religiously (including, but not limited to, Word, PowerPoint, and Excel). I have found that Google Docs and Forms are helpful in my position to keep up with some of the housekeeping information I need to keep the office stocked with snacks and the correct extensions on business cards. I am also starting to rely on the Outlook calendar to keep me from sending calls to someone who is out of the office. The new phone system also has a neat feature that allows me to keep track of who is available in the office to take a call. The Spark chat program allows me to do the same thing but lets me communicate with a coworker in a less disruptive way.

What does your workspace look like?

Brenna's current workspace.

Brenna’s current workspace.

Some of the tasks that I execute throughout my day take a lot of space so I have a three-sided desk and an extra credenza that I try to keep cleared off as much as I can. My goldfish Tervis cup is the only personal item on my desk but its super cheerful. Because I am the first person most visitors see I am trying very hard to keep my space looking professional.

I do have an entire wall of windows that overlook the parking lot. Including the sunroof above my head, I get lots of sunshine, my favorite!

What are you currently working on?

As part of the Business and Administrative Services team, I am able to participate in many different projects. I am currently training with the support team how to enter students into our Pointwise and Glyph training registration program, also I am working with the sales team on processing the leads that result from our awesome webinars. I am also in charge of keeping the office supplies and the snacks for staff in stock and available. Oh, and the phones! I answer the phones and help direct callers to the person that can best assist them.

What would you say is your specialty at Pointwise?

I am a friendly face that greets all with a kind word and a sunny smile.

Any tips, tricks, or advice for our users?

Check out our YouTube channel. In addition to our staff posting videos, a few of our customers and software partners have participated in our webinars and demonstrate how they use Pointwise for their applications.

What project are you most proud of and why?

I was able to use my teacher background and prepare the materials for the staff instructor of the Glyph training, Claudio, in a way that cut down on the confusion of having several different handouts. As I was printing the exercises I noticed that I was keeping separate stacks for the problems and for the answers and that I was color coding them for my own peace of mind and I thought that Claudio might appreciate this as well. The result was a pocket file folder with each exercise and solution separated with a divider that corresponded to the color coded table of contents attached to the front and a space in the back for an instructor copy of the handbook that each trainee was given.
This made things much easier for Claudio during the training. He knew exactly which stack of pages to hand out when, and no one got the answer before they could attempt to work out the scenario. The trainees raved about the amount of time they had to practice what they were learning. My inner teacher beamed upon hearing this.

Have you recently read any books or articles we should know about?

I just finished reading the latest installment in the Stephanie Plum series of novels by my favorite author Janet Evanovich. I have also started to re-read the Harry Potter series of novels. I like to get lost in another world for a while.

What do you do when you’re not surrounded by engineers making meshes?

My husband, Chris, and I love to be outdoors, or relaxing watching TV. Basically, anything that we can do together is a good time. We play board games, watch sci-fi shows, play Rock Band, and we like to hang out in our backyard. We just bought a hot tub so we watch movies projected onto the second story of our house while we relax in the tub.

What is some of the best advice you’ve received?

The best advice has come from Ellen DeGeneres when she voiced a cartoon fish named Dory in the movie Finding Nemo.

“Just keep swimming.”

This was the motto for my graduating class in college and has really helped me navigate the rapids of life since then. As long as I just keep trying, keep moving, keep hope, I can do anything. Life is not always a smooth path but you have to keep going to get to the good stuff.

If you had to pick a place to have dinner, where would you go?

I love food. Mexican food is my favorite but if I had to pick ONE place…I would pick Babe’s Chicken. They have the best side dishes, family-style and they keep them coming, that pairs fabulously with any of their main dish options. I highly recommend the chicken fried steak or the hickory smoked chicken.


CFD News/Links Round-Up Clean-Up

$
0
0

My bookmarks folder in Chrome has become hopelessly cluttered with links that never made it into This Week in CFD (along with other “personal” links). Without further adieu, here they are, unwashed and unsorted.


This Week in CFD

$
0
0

News & Events

  • If you recall last summer’s announcement of the National Strategic Computing Initiative, you might be interested to know that it is now appearing in the federal budget. An alphabet soup of federal government agencies are involved but DoE and NSF are budgeting $285 million and $33 million, respectively.
  • The keynote speaker for this year’s CD-adapco STAR Global Conference is Martin Whitmarsh, CEO of Land Rover and former CEO of McLaren F1.
  • Registration is open for DEVELOP3D Live, a 1-day event on design and manufacturing technology, to be held 31 March in Warwick, UK.

Gerald Farin

The world of geometry modeling and computer graphics lost a pioneer and leader earlier this month with the passing of Gerald Farin, author of perhaps the principle text on geometry modeling, Curves and Surfaces for Computed Aided Geometric Design (CAGD).

Software

AVL FIRE M. Image (c) AVL. See link above.

AVL FIRE M. Image (c) AVL. See link below.

  • DEVELOP3D reviewed SimScale’s cloud-based CFD and FEA platform, designed to target the issues of “cost and access to computational resources.”  Their freemium pricing model offers 3,000 compute hours for free as long as all your simulations are public.
  • CONSELF (CONsulting by yourSELF) also offers a free Welcome plan for cloud-based CFD.
  • And DEVELOP3D took a step back and wrote about how cloud-based simulation tools could and should behave. [Worth reading.]
  • Speaking of SimScale, they seek your participation in a survey on “Industry 4.0” and it’s impact on the engineering community. Should take 5-10 minutes and you might win a prize.
  • Symscape shows how co-processing can help you monitor progress of your CFD solution.
  • KARALIT CFD v4.0 was released with new time dependent BCs, a k-epsilon turbulence model, and new licensing options.
  • AVL List GmbH launched AVL FIRE M, a new CFD platform with improvements across the board. [I haven’t seen news about FIRE in a long time. This is a good thing.]
CFD solution computed using CD-adapco software by Nissan Motorsport. Image from Professional Motor Sport World. See link below.

CFD solution computed using CD-adapco software by Nissan Motorsport. Image from Professional Motor Sport World. See link below.

Applications & Visualization

Meshing Greatness

Who says meshing is dull? The new video for Greatness by Karma Fields featuring Talib Kweli is chock full of Voronoi polygons, Dirichlet tessellations, and overall faceted goodness. The video is rated mature for [one particular line in the] lyrics so it’s probably NSFW. Watch at your own risk.

Screen capture from the video Greatness by Karma Fields ft. Talib Kweli. See link above.

Screen capture from the video Greatness by Karma Fields ft. Talib Kweli. See link above.


I’m Dr. Michael G. Remotigue and This Is How I Mesh

$
0
0
Dr. Michael Remotigue, Engineering Specialist on the Product Development Team.

Dr. Michael Remotigue, Engineering Specialist on the Product Development Team.

I grew up in Fairfield, OH, a bedroom community of Cincinnati.  I’m the second oldest of four brothers.  My father is Filipino and my mother is German.   It was the summer after my freshman year of college when I met my wife, Robyn, from a close friend, when I was actually on a blind date setup by my older brother.  We dated through college and married right after she graduated.  We have two boys, Aaron and Ethan, and they were born in Mississippi.

I received my B.S. of Engineering Mechanics from the University of Cincinnati in 1986.  To be honest, engineering was not my first choice of vocation, initially I was thinking of becoming a veterinarian.  My late father practiced Family Medicine and my brothers and I found many of our days going to the hospital and waiting in the doctors’ lounge till he finished his rounds.  I ended up perusing through the medical journals and books.  Mainly the pictures and drawings were eye opening, amazing, and disgusting.  Who really reads them for the articles?  I eventually became desensitized and very clinically minded, I just thought animals would not argue as much and be better patients, plus they are just cuter.  I was accepted at Purdue and another college I can’t remember, but chose to attend The Ohio State University.  The spring of 1981, I changed my mind after attending an orientation at OSU.  At that moment, it just dawned on me that after four years of study, I would not be marketable until I actually completed another four years of vet school.  I did not want that much school.  Little did I know at that point what my true aspirations were.  After that fateful day, I scrambled to decide on what I wanted to study and where, before I graduated high school.  It was a toss-up between Aerospace and Mechanical.  At the time, UC offered a B.S. in Engineering Mechanics, out of the Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, that allowed for additional unspecified engineering electives that the other degrees did not offer.  I saw that as an opportunity to allow for exploration in various engineering courses.

In 1983, it was during my first of five co-ops at Eglin AFB, FL that I got my introduction to the field of mesh generation and CFD when I met Profs. Joe Thompson and Wayne Mastin during one of their many visits where they were working on a new mesh generation code called EAGLE.  On my third and remaining co-ops, I managed to get into the CFD group headed by Dr. Lawrence Lijewski and used EAGLE to create meshes, submit CFD runs over a telephone modem, and also helped develop and maintain a visualization tool.   It was exciting to work next to and get educated by these people who ultimately steered my studies at UC.

Upon graduation, I hired on at General Dynamics in Fort Worth, TX and was assigned to the CFD group headed by Ishwar Bhately, where I met Chawner, Steinbrenner, Fouts, Matus, and Karman.  I tweaked and used Gridgen and ran CFD analysis on different projects like the National Aero-Space Plane (NASP), F-16, A-12 and YF-22.   I did a lot of complaining to the development team back then when I encountered bugs.  I was also responsible to bug fix and compile the flow-field visualization packages provided by NASA, Plot3D/Real3D, when new updates came and to also develop a plotting package to display data in various graphs.  After the A-12 cancellation in January 1991 I was released and I focused on finishing my M.S. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Texas at Arlington, which I completed later that fall.   What should have been a downturn in a career, turned out to be a blessing in disguise.  It so happened, that my M.S. advisor, Prof. David Thompson ran into Joe Thompson at an AIAA conference that year.  Thompson was looking for new graduates to help staff the National Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Research Center (ERC) at Mississippi State University (MSU) and he remembered me and requested that I send him a resume.

Before I was allowed to take the job, Robyn insisted that I show her where Starkville, MS was on the map.  When I arrived, my initial task was to continue the development and training of EAGLE, but eventually with another colleague, Dr. Michael Stokes, we developed a graphical user interface version called EAGLEView that allowed graphical manipulation of the geometry and mesh, active selection, used popup dialogue boxes to capture selections and required inputs to generate the script language of EAGLE, record the commands, and display the results from EAGLE on the screen.  After a year passed, I started my Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at MSU one-class-at-a-time and concurrently EAGLEView matured and became a viable “free” mesh generator, but one drawback became apparently clear, the geometry representation was a spline of discrete data points.  There was a push to describe the geometry accurately and actually have the mesh represent the model to a tighter tolerance.

In 1993, I joined a team of developers and academics to create a new software product called the National Grid Project (NGP) that addressed the need to mesh directly on imported CAD data via the use of Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS) and it was to be able to create multi-block structured and unstructured meshes in the same system using the same geometry model tied together by a solid modeling data structure.  After two years of development, the software was never released due to stability and robustness issues, but Brian Jean and I were given a terminal mandate to at least demonstrate it’s potential.  Brian Jean was in charge of developing and stabilizing the underlying NURBS data structure and related utilities library, which was called ATLAS.  I was in charge of everything else. In 1996, I stuck my neck out again, and maybe stretched Brian’s a bit, by arguing that I could salvage a structured code within a year.  We needed something to replace EAGLEView and fast.  It was lagging behind since all my time was being focused elsewhere.   The research faculty and staff were not getting the required geometric fidelity needed for their CFD simulations.

We were successful; the resulting software was called GUM-B (General Unstructured Multi-Block).  GUM-B was used in-house at the ERC and “given” to various companies, government labs, and universities.   An additional tool called GUMBO (General Unstructured Multi-Block Omnitool) was developed shortly after, and it allowed multi-block structured grids to be read in and pre-processed for the various CFD solvers that were used in-house and by our users.  I desperately wanted to use the acronym POKI, but just could not figure out a decent description.  Inside GUMBO, the assigned boundary conditions and connectivity were tracked and copied as needed during splitting, merging and transformations.  It became a valuable front end to TURBO, the parallel turbo-machinery code, developed at the ERC and provided to industry, academia and NASA Glenn.

When I received my Ph.D. in 1999, I hired on as an Assistant Research Professor in the SimCenter at MSU, which was later merged into the Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems (CAVS) SimCenter.  In addition to maintaining and developing GUM-B, GUMBO, and teaching an occasional class, I took on the responsibility to maintain and develop the unstructured sister code, SolidMesh, which was developed by Adam Gaither.  The codes were developed using the same geometry, graphics, and GUI libraries.  The topology data structure was similar but it was less rigid.  Just the mesh generation algorithms were different.  However, that quickly changed when I started adding the structured algorithms into SolidMesh.

Later as an Associate Research Professor and before I left MSU, I was developing SolidMesh++ (SM++), which would have a journaling/scripting capability, OpenGL support, a stand-alone API library capable for rapid software integration, and a customizable GUI.  SM++ was used in designing an urban modeling system, BlastScape which generated a simplistic geometric description of buildings or obstructions and the blast information which was imported into MeshScape, which automatically generated either structured or unstructured meshes for the farfield, the nearfield, the overset mesh around the prescribed geometries and a hemisphere for the blast description.  SM++ was also used to rapidly generate 100s of blast-soil mesh cases, which were created by using a Voronoi diagram from random points.  The Voronoi regions represented soil particles and were “exploded” at various time scales.  Only those particles that where within a prescribed expanding unit square where used and the exposed gaps where meshed.  The grids were used to calibrate the blast model.  The full functionality of the SM++ API was never completely integrated into a GUI before I left.

Sadly, research funding is not guaranteed in academia and as things were becoming tight, I decided that a change of scenery was needed and I reached out to Pointwise, my first choice.  In August 2012, I joined the Pointwise team and worked remotely for a year so Aaron could graduate high school.  Now I’m in Fort Worth and enjoying every day.  The one thing that makes me excited is that the software has a lot of potential to add new features and capabilities.  The CAD import, solver export, technical support, training, documentation, and marketing and sales capabilities of Pointwise Inc. are what I dreamed I had for my software.   Pointwise is very similar in concept to the software that I developed, but it is more complex, software engineered, and has more tools to make quality meshes.  This is the NGP concept.  There has been a lot of thought and development that allows both the structured and unstructured capabilities to co-exist, work seamlessly together, and still create a quality mesh.  A blessing for me is that I just focus on the bug fixing, research and development, which has been relaxing and less stressful.   Maybe I should not mention it here; much to the delight of the family, I don’t bring my work home with me as often.

  • Location: Fort Worth, TX
  • Current position: Engineering Specialist, Product Development
  • Current computer: iMac 27” Retina 5K Display, 32 GB 1600 MHz DDR3, 3.3 GHz Intel Core i5, OS X El Capitan, AMD Radeon R9 M290 2048 MB, Hewlitt Packard 27” HP2711x monitor (1080×1920), wired keyboard with numeric keypad, magic mouse
  • One word that best describes how you work: Methodical

What software or tools do you use every day?

I’m old school when it comes to my text editor.  I’m like Michael Mirsky, Vim is my editor of choice.  I started using vi at Eglin AFB when I had to edit batch scripts at a remote sight across a dial-up modem and I have been using it ever since.  Just never really saw a need to change, just evolve.  I use Perforce for revision control.  Steve Karman and I are considered the misguided duo because we both use Mac OS X computers as our development platform.  They have proven many times over how temperamental they are, but I have grown accustomed to the idiosyncrasies.  My de facto debugger and compiler is Xcode.

What does your workspace look like?

Michael's current workspace.

Michael’s current workspace.

My cubical is located in the product development suite on the first floor by a window.  The window is key, because the time of year dictates if the ever-present fan or heater is in operation.  When I was remote, I bought a Herman Miller Mirra chair and an Anthro 48” Adjusta ergonomic computer desk on wheels, so I can move them around easily and occasionally work standing, and I now have at work.  I mounted a 4 port usb 3.0 hub to the front underside of the fixed desk to allow flexibility to plugin external drives and flash drives and a power strip on the back metal plate.  Stealing an idea from Michael Mirsky, I mounted my 27” monitor in portrait mode next to the iMac, which is used to display mail, messages, browser, and Xcode.  I mounted it this way so I could have the iMac positioned in front of me, where I run Pointwise and text edit, and only glance at the portrait monitor as needed.

My desk is my sanctuary; it is what I would call organized chaos.  What ever the current project is I’m working on, the associated papers, books and notes get piled on it until the task is done.  I would be deeply amiss if I did not mention how I isolate myself from the ever-present pedestrian and traffic noise that comes through the window.  My Audeze EL-8CB headphones, Audioengine N22 amplifier, iPod classic (loaded with Jazz, Rock-N-Roll, Metal, Pop, Alternative, and Christian Rock), and LG G Pad 7.0 (streaming Sirius/XM, CNN, or ESPN) help isolate and tune out the noise of the outside world and the consistent clicking of keyboards.

What are you currently working on? 

Fixing bugs in Pointwise V18, but most recently trying to improve the unstructured normal extrusion and structured algebraic & hyperbolic extrusion algorithms.   The most recent issue is the instability of the structured normal extrusion in regions where a singularity is present, and I have been determining how to detect the divergence and correct the problem.

What would you say is your meshing specialty?

My introduction into the field was multi-block structured meshing, but developed tools to read, process, and generate CAD geometry.  Eventually I ventured into unstructured mesh generation.  Overall, my specialty has been to integrate mesh generation tools, functionality, and utilities into a graphical user interface system.

Any tips for our users?

In Pointwise V18, the unstructured normal extrusion functionality and options have changed.  Some corrections are also being done to the structured hyperbolic and algebraic extrusions to help robustness.  There will definitely be a change in the grid, but hopefully the results will be a better quality mesh like I have been seeing in my tests.

What project are you most proud of and why? 

In the soon to be released Pointwise V18, the join unstructured blocks capability was a fun and interesting project.  Not only did it help me understand the code, but also it gives me great satisfaction when I know it will be a useful tool for the user.  Programming the functionality helped me learn about the different block topology data structures and many other aspects of the Pointwise software and its infrastructure.  I like a challenge and figuring out the science that has gone into the development of Pointwise is one and I’m highly impressed by the computer science that is used and how some of the mesh generation algorithms are refactored.

What CFD solver and postprocessor do you use most often?

The last CFD solvers that I used were the research codes developed at MSU.  I haven’t had a need to use one since joining Pointwise, but I have used Tecplot, FieldView, and ParaView to visualize the mesh.  I now mostly view the mesh in Pointwise V18.

Are you reading any interesting technical papers we should know about?

I have not been reading anything new at this moment.  I have been refreshing my knowledge of hyperbolic mesh generation, by reviewing “Hyperbolic Methods for Surface and Field Grid Generation”, William M. Chan, Handbook of Grid Generation, Eds. Thompson, Soni, Weatherill, CRC Press and A Generalized Scheme for Three-Dimensional Hyperbolic Grid Generation, William M. Chan and Joseph L. Steger, AIAA-91-1588-CP.

Do you plan on attending any conferences or workshops this year? 

May attend AIAA Aviation or the International Meshing Roundtable.

What do you do when you’re not generating meshes? 

When not at work, my time is spent with church, family, projects and hobbies.   I am active at Arborlawn United Methodist church and Ethan’s youth group at Genesis United Methodist church.   I’m also on the Troop Committee of Ethan’s Boy Scout troop and go camping when I can.    Aaron already received his Eagle Scout, but he is now in Austin attending the University of Texas, which we frequently visit.  Other family travels have taken us to Yellowstone National Park and Mt. Rushmore, the Big Island of Hawaii, and most recently a trip to the San Jose/San Francisco area to visit family.

Robyn understands that before we call a repairman and if it is not under warranty, I will try to diagnose the problem myself and then make the assessment to see if it is something I could do.  If it requires a tool and I don’t have it, I would buy it or rent it.  I like home projects and the satisfaction I did it myself; for example, I did renovations to our house in Mississippi, like installing bamboo flooring, tiling, detailed trim work, painting, plumbing, electrical re-wiring for new light fixtures, installing a stove/oven and dishwasher, and building a built-in entertainment center. The one thing I will not do is wallpaper.  I just do not have the patience to install it.  We moved into a nine year-old house in Texas, so my projects have been minor home improvements and repairs. I added additional interior lights, replaced the sled on the garage track, rewired the garage door when it came off track, replaced a hose on the washing machine, replaced a broken exterior light receptacle, and replaced a light switch.   Robyn does see some painting in my near future.

One of my hobbies is related to my project interest, since I need another excuse to use my tools, I have made a bench, a bookcase, and floating shelves.  I’ve also been the self-designated photographer at both of my son’s school activities and provided the pictures to the parents and the school yearbook.  Last year I upped my game by purchasing a new 24 MP Nikon DSLR with 5 frames per second and a 28-300mm telephoto lens.  I’m also a self-proclaimed audio/videophile and have a collection of music and movies on disc and digital as well as vinyl records, that I play on my 7.1 stereo system composed of Paradigm speakers, Denon components, Apple TV, Roku, and a 64” Samsung 3D plasma TV.  The system has taken me 15 years to assemble.  I do prefer to watch movies at home than in the theater.

I also have a collection of 200+ die-cast miniature cars.  Majority of them are Matchbox superfast cars, I liked these cars since they were less futuristic and resembled actual car models.  Recently, I haven’t been actively collecting them, especially after Mattel acquired them.  It was difficult to find models without flashy paint and unrealistic modifications.  My oldest car is about 1969 and I have a few with a cracked windshield and nicks in the paint.  I have a small collection of Matchbox Premier Series models along with my Gumby and Pokey figurines on my file cabinet at work.

What is some of the best CFD advice you’ve ever received?

The best advise or visual was from Prof. Joe Thompson when he first explained the concept of multi-block structured meshing to a naïve co-op at Eglin AFB – If you visualize each block like a sponge and if you can fit it in the field to model your geometry, then you should be able to grid it.  What an eye opener that concept was and that sparked an interest in this new field of study.

If you had to pick a place to have dinner, where would you go? 

My absolute go to restaurants would be the Montgomery Inn Boathouse and any Skyline Chili in Cincinnati, OH.  Our family eats there every time we go home to visit relatives.  We also travel through Starkville, MS regularly and we frequent The Little Dooey, Newks, and City Bagel while there.  Locally in Fort Worth, Cousins BBQ, Saltgrass Steak House, and 3 Parrots Taco Shop are favorites.  Personally I like sushi, the family not so much, but Sushi Axiom is one of my choices.  But to be honest, I do prefer my cooking overall.


This Week in CFD

$
0
0

Pointwise User Group Meeting 2016

pw-ugm-2016-masthead-blue-790x150

Come join us in Fort Worth, Texas on 21-22 September for the Pointwise User Group Meeting 2016. The call for papers is open (due date is 01 July) – this is your opportunity to share your CFD work and the Pointwise meshes you used.

Software

  • CFMS will participate in the UK’s Hyperflux++ project which aims to create the next generation of CFD tools using high order methods.
  • CONSELF Cloud CFD v2.0 was released with new features such as vertical apps, cut cell hex meshing, and improved BC setup.
  • CONSELF also explains common CFD terms.
  • ENGINEERING.com writes about improvements to the Cartesian meshing in FloEFD v15.
  • And Desktop Engineering interviewed Mentor Graphics’ manager for the aerospace and defense market on how FloEFD serves CFD use in small and medium sized enterprises. “FloEFD’s solver is so stable that the designer would have to apply irrational boundary conditions for the solver to diverge and not come to a solution.”
  • DEVELOP3D calls ANSYS “a simulation legend” in this article about Workbench R17.
  • FEATool 1.4 (FEA toolbox for MATLAB) was released with major changes across the entire application.

Applications

This EnSight visualization of a CONVERGE model won Aimilios Sofianopoulus the cover of Stony Brook University Institute of Advanced Computational Science Annual Magazine. Image from CEI.  Sorry, no URL.

This EnSight visualization of a CONVERGE model won Aimilios Sofianopoulus the cover of Stony Brook University Institute of Advanced Computational Science Annual Magazine. Image from CEI. Sorry, no URL.

ANSYS CFD simulation of a Red Bull Formula 1 car. Image from InsideHPC.com. See link above.

ANSYS CFD simulation of a Red Bull Formula 1 car. Image from InsideHPC.com. See link above.

People & Events

Computers and Computing

  • If you missed the 2016 Stanford HPC Conference you can catch-up on exascale, the cloud, and more in their video gallery (including presentations from Rescale and UberCloud).
  • Vulkan 1.0 is a “new generation graphics and compute API” for use with GPUs.
  • A European consortium is working on ARM-based exascale computing.
  • And Inside HPC also writes about some of the specific challenges of bringing HPC into the cloud.

Red Meshing

Red Painting (see below) may be my favorite of Mark Bradford’s works and not just because of its mesh-like appearance. However, just like meshing there are aspects of both order and chaos, process and automatism, surface and depth.

And he must be having a little fun with us because it’s not really a painting. It’s categorized as a mixed media collage. He layers on papers, pigment, and other materials and then works it over by scoring and sanding. Kinda like generating an initial mesh and then smoothing and refining it. (Did I take the meshing analogy one step too far?)

Mark Bradford, Red Painting, 2009. Click image for source.

Mark Bradford, Red Painting, 2009. Click image for source.


Viewing all 175 articles
Browse latest View live